42 Years - A Professional Law Corporation - Helping Asbestos Victims Since 1974

Posts by: Steven Kazan

Kazan Law Leads Efforts to Pass AB 1875

On September 17, 2012, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill that Kazan Law was instrumental in advocating. A significant triumph for organizations that seek justice for consumers and workers, AB 1875 places limits on how long a deposition may take.

Deposition abuse – extending depositions of victims for days on end – has been a problem not only for those suffering from asbestos-related diseases, but also for others who may be enduring similar situations. AB 1875 now limits victims’ depositions of ill and dying victims, including those dying from asbestos, to two days of seven hours each, for a total of fourteen hours. Exceptions can be made if a judge decides that more time is absolutely necessary.

Kazan Law has witnessed many appalling instances of deposition abuse in our nearly 40 years fighting for asbestos victims. Our clients and those represented by other lawyers have been made to endure marathon depositions from defense attorneys that sadly ended with tragic consequences. Consider these cases as examples of victims who could have been protected with AB 1875:

John Tommaney’s doctors told him that the mesothelioma would not respond to radiation or chemotherapy and that hospice care should be arranged. In our direct-examination deposition, Mr. Tommaney shared all of his pertinent knowledge about his life and imminent death in testimony lasting just four hours. The defense attorneys’ cross-examination went on to prolong questioning for more than 26 hours over a span of 22 days. On the 23rd day, his attorney informed the defendants, “Mr. Tommaney is unavailable for deposition today as he died last night.”

Mesothelioma victim John Johnson was aggressively deposed for 25 hours over the course of 41 days while his health drastically declined. Less than one hour after his last deposition session, Mr. Johnson was rushed to the hospital, where he died. In his medical records, the diagnosis is listed as “sudden cardiac arrest while giving a courtroom deposition.”

Bob Thacker did not live long enough to see his day in court. Mr. Thacker passed away after 22 days of deposition, most of which was repetitive and pointless. Unfortunately, Mr. Thacker’s survivors did not have the same legal rights after he died, and his death prevented the responsible party from being held fully accountable.

California Assemblyman Mike Gatto (D – Burbank) is the author of AB 1875, which was introduced on February 22, 2012, and passed the full California Legislature. The Consumer Attorneys of California was the official sponsor of the legislation.

In our efforts to pass AB 1875, Kazan Law staff met with members of the California Legislature in both the Assembly and Senate and urged their support of the bill. Kazan clients wrote letters to their State Senators also urging their support. All Democratic State Senate Members, except Juan Vargas, voted for the bill. All Republican State Senate Members, except for two abstentions, voted against protecting asbestos victims.

UICC Seeks Global Ban of Asbestos

The Union for International Control of Cancer (UICC) took a major step recently when it called for a complete ban on the mining, use and exportation of all forms of asbestos, Right On Canada reported.

According to the news source, the UICC, which includes more than 700 member organizations throughout 155 different countries, pointed specifically to countries that mine and export the carcinogenic substance. The organization sought to halt these mining and exportation practices, while offering economic assistance during the transition period for mining communities.

One community that immediately comes to mind is that of the appropriately named Asbestos, Quebec. With Canada well-known for its exportation of asbestos to developing countries, the town of Asbestos is a major factor, as it hosts the Jeffrey Mine. The mine recently received a boost in the form of a $58 million loan from the government. This, despite a number of calls for Canada to bring its exportation policies more in line with its asbestos restrictions at home.

UICC statement points to scientific evidence

In its Position Statement calling for the ban of asbestos and the halting of such exports, the UICC noted that there has been a known link between asbestos and lung disease since the early part of the 18th century. Since the mid-1960s, it has been known that exposure to asbestos can lead to the development of lung cancer, asbestosis and malignant mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer.

Such evidence is a major factor in the decisions of many countries to adopt bans on asbestos, particularly when the true toll of asbestos-related diseases is taken into account. According to the UICC’s statement, more than 92,000 mesothelioma deaths were reported in 83 different countries between 1994 and 2008.

Further, according to the World Health Organization, approximately 107,000 people around the world each year succumb to asbestos-related diseases like asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma.

Children May be Fragile Following Mesothelioma Diagnosis of a Relative

older woman holding girlA diagnosis of cancer, including malignant mesothelioma, can affect all aspects of an individual’s life – work, leisure time activity, plans for the future, spirituality and relationships. Children in particular can be sensitive to the news about a loved one’s diagnosis because they may not always be mature enough to deal with their feelings on their own. In these cases, they may need help from their parents, counselors or other trusted adults.

At Kazan, McClain, Lyons, Greenwood and Harley, we want to make sure that every member of the family – including the youngest and most tender – gets the support that he or she needs.

Breaking the news

The bottom line in helping children understand what is happening is to be truthful with them. According to the American Cancer Society, the most basic information that all kids need include the name of the disease, the affected part of the body, how it will be treated and how their lives may change.

However, the level of details that you share with them depends on their age. Younger children may need to be reassured that they did not do anything to cause the mesothelioma, and that the condition is not contagious.

If they wonder whether their relative will die from mesothelioma, it is important to remember that although the truth is necessary, that does not mean everything needs to be shared all at once. In this case, it may be better to focus on the present, and save potentially devastating news for when a prognosis is definite.

These discussions are best held in an environment free of potential distractions or interruptions. It will be helpful to plan what to say ahead of time, and emphasize that the lines of communication will always be open for questions or concerns.

All children are unique, so each youngster may react to the news in a different way. Even though they may not always be able to articulate their feelings, they will always show them in some way. Signs that a child may need professional help include chronic sadness, persistent irritability, changing grades, differences in appetite, insomnia and difficulty concentrating.

Maintaining routines

According to the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, routine can create a sense of security for children. To that end, mealtimes, bedtimes and other scheduled activities should be maintained. Any changes, such as a visit to the hospital, need to be discussed ahead of time. Furthermore, it is important to maintain discipline and behavioral limits.

Some, but not all, children may like to help out around the house with chores. However, parents need to remember to be realistic about these tasks, and to allow kids to have fun just being kids.

Mesothelioma Patients can Learn to Cope with ‘Chemo Brain’

comtemplative manIf you’ve been newly diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, you already know that you’ll have to make some major adjustments. While there is no cure for this disease, there are different treatments that can make life as functional and comfortable as possible. Chemotherapy is one of the regimens most commonly used to help patients.

However, this treatment can cause side effects. Among them? Chemo brain.

Fog and forgetfulness while fighting disease

According to the National Cancer Institute, it’s not uncommon for patients who are fighting malignant diseases to experience confusion, depression or forgetfulness – all of which can be possible side effects of chemotherapy.

Medical experts have a hard time agreeing on how common chemo brain is among patients taking these medications. Scientists from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) point out that estimates range from 25 to 82 percent.

But one thing is certain: Chemo brain is real.

In order to understand why cancer patients have these neurological symptoms, UCLA researchers conducted an experiment in which they imaged the brains of three groups of women: breast cancer patients who had chemotherapy, those treated with surgery and healthy women who never had breast cancer or chemotherapy.

The cortical images taken during this experiment showed that blood flow and metabolism were different in the brains of patients who had chemotherapy.

Later, when the test subjects were taking memory tests, brain scans showed that the chemotherapy patients’ brains had to work harder, compared to those of the healthy women.

There are ways to deal with chemo brain

At Kazan, McClain, Lyons, Greenwood and Harley, we’re committed to helping all of our clients who have mesothelioma cope with the changes in their lives as best as we can.

From the Mayo Clinic, we’ve learned about several ways that people with mesothelioma can deal with chemo brain:

  • If you have trouble concentrating, try eliminating noise and other distractions from your environment.
  • Before taking on a complex task, try to plan ahead, remember to eat right and get plenty of sleep – all these things will boost your focus.
  • Use tools, such as daily planners or calendars, to stay organized.
  • If you’re tackling a long and labor-intensive task, take plenty of breaks to let your mind rest
  • Keep your brain sharp with the help of crossword puzzles and other games.
  • Remember to exercise. Physical activity can help alleviate fatigue, stress and depression.

Caught in the Act: OSHA Cites Seven Contractors over Asbestos Violations

contractor on ladderThe Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently issued citations to seven contractors after they allegedly exposed their employees to asbestos on a construction site, according to a release from the federal agency.

The contractors, including three based in Miami and four based in San Antonio, were cited with 45 serious violations and one other-than-serious violation at a worksite in San Antonio. The proposed penalties from OSHA totaled $148,000, according to the release.

OSHA said the violations stemmed from work that took place at the Reserve at Pecan Valley apartment complex. In March, inspectors with the agency conducted a health and safety inspection at the site and reportedly found that workers were not wearing the proper protective equipment or clothing while renovating apartments.

The specific violations listed by OSHA included failing to ensure that employees work in regulated areas, failing to perform proper air monitoring for asbestos, and failing to adequately train employees to work with asbestos, the release noted.

Dangers of asbestos highlighted by OSHA action

The significant fines levied against the seven contractors emphasizes the critical nature of protecting employees from asbestos exposure. In the release, OSHA’s regional administrator in Dallas noted that following the agency’s standards when it comes to working with asbestos is essential for ensuring employee safety.

“Asbestos is an extremely hazardous material that can potentially cause lifelong, irreversible health conditions,” said John Hermanson, OSHA’s regional administrator in Dallas. “It is imperative that OSHA’s safety and health standards be followed to avoid accidents, injuries and illnesses.”

Hermanson’s comments are in line with scientific evidence that has continued to pile up in recent years. According to the World Health Organization, asbestos-related diseases such as lung cancer, malignant mesothelioma and asbestosis are responsible for the deaths of approximately 107,000 people around the world each year.

As a result, a number of countries have taken steps to heavily restrict or ban the mining, use and exportation of asbestos. In Brazil, the Supreme Court is currently holding hearings regarding the ban of asbestos. In Canada, the Quebec government is facing serious scrutiny from medical experts and advocacy groups over its decision to provide the Jeffrey asbestos mine with a significant loan that would revitalize its operations.

Kazan Law is the only Asbestos Law Firm in the World to present at iMig 2012

I am pleased and honored that Kazan, McClain, Lyons, Greenwood & Harley has been invited to present four abstracts at iMig 2012, an international conference where mesothelioma expert physicians and researchers gather from all over the world every two years to discuss recent developments.

Throughout the world there have been hundreds of papers submitted and approved for presentation. Only four of those papers were submitted by attorneys and all four of those papers are from our firm.

In this video I present and discuss four posters with abstracts published by iMig. This knowledge has grown from my 20 year experience with asbestos trust funds and almost 40 yrs representing asbestos victims. As hard as we focus on the fight for justice for each one of our clients, sometimes our discoveries in the process bring forth implications which are more important than the case itself.

Related posts:

Kazan Law to Present Four Abstracts at the iMig Boston 2012 Conference

2012 Allen E. Broussard Law School Scholarship Awards Presented

As Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Allen E. Broussard Law School Scholarship Fund and program sponsor, I enjoyed the honor of presenting scholarship awards last Friday with board member Jill Dessalines at a small reception in Oakland. The Allen E. Broussard Scholarship Foundation is committed to the continued pursuit of Justice Broussard’s life long desire to assist minorities in their pursuit of higher education, better job opportunities and careers in the legal profession.

At $5,000 each the Broussard Scholarship award is the largest private scholarship award for law students attending California Bay Area law schools. The Broussard award has assisted three or more academically well qualified students from economically deprived backgrounds each year since 1997.

2012 Broussard Scholarship Award Recipients

Lizbeth MalmsteadLizbeth Malmstead is a first year law student at University of San Francisco School of Law. The youngest of five children, Ms. Malmstead is the first in her entire family to attend college. Growing up near the Tijuana-San Diego border, she has witnessed her community struggle with drug cartels, immigration, and poverty. Ms. Malmstead’s hope is to strengthen her community and other similar communities by being a voice for them. She believes that a law degree is a step towards that goal.

I will introduce the other 2012 recipients in a subsequent article.

Kazan Law to Present Four Abstracts at the iMig Boston 2012 Conference

One of the most vitally important groups dedicated to the fight against asbestos caused mesothelioma cancers is the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig). iMig is comprised of independent international scientists and clinicians with the mission of working to understand, cure and prevent mesothelioma. From their inaugural conference in Paris in 1991, iMig’s focus has been two-fold:

  • Host: hold an international mesothelioma conference on alternate years, alternating between USA and non-USA host cities
  • Collaboration: improve collaboration by collecting a list of available resources, current research projects, and other laboratory techniques that might facilitate collaboration as well as providing an opportunity for networking during the biennial conferences.

Kazan Law’s Commitment to iMig

Kazan Law was the first law firm in the world to sign on as a sponsor for this year’s conference. We began our participation at the Chicago iMig meeting in 2006. Since that time, we have sponsored and supported iMig conferences in Amsterdam 2008, Kyoto 2010, the upcoming conference in Boston 2012, and are already helping to fund Capetown 2014.

Kazan Law to Present Four Abstracts at iMig Conference

Our support for iMig has grown beyond our role as a sponsor. We are honored and proud to announce that four abstracts have been chosen from Kazan Law for poster presentation at this year’s Boston conference:

  • Abstract 1: my summary of asbestos bankruptcy trusts. Included will be information on total dollars available for claimants, the number of foreign admitted exposure sites and ships on which products are conceded, the values each trust applies for mesothelioma claims, and a discussion of the availability of some of these funds for foreign claimants.
  • Abstract 2: a case report highlighting the inadequacies demonstrated by relying on death certificates in studies of the incidence of mesothelioma. The basis for the report is a Kazan Law client with well-established and treated mesothelioma. The client who died 11 years later had a death certificate signed by a doctor who failed to list the cause of death as mesothelioma.
  • Abstract 3 by Kazan Law associate Justin Bosl: a summary of the state of the literature for the entity called localized malignant mesothelioma. This is a very rare form of mesothelioma with less than 100 cases in the reported literature, one of whom was Kazan Law client Tim Vest. To fully prepare his case we had to tabulate all of the cases looking at questions regarding long-term survival and/or cure as well as the percentage with asbestos exposure.
  • Abstract 4 by Kazan Law associate William Ruiz: in preparing a case for Kazan Law client Rick Fenstermaker, we had to demonstrate that Union Carbide’s Calidira fiber mined in King City, California contained significant levels of tremolite asbestos (an amphibole which is a conceded cause of mesothelioma) as a significant contaminant of the mines chrysotile asbestos. Yet, some companies still argue that King City asbestos cannot cause mesothelioma.

Kazan Law’s Commitment to Research

The Kazan, McClain, Abrams, Fernandez, Lyons, Greenwood, Oberman, Satterley & Bosl Foundation, Inc, has committed almost $6 million in grants for medical research to find a cure for mesothelioma. We have long supported the international efforts to ban its use. We have disbursed almost $20 million in grants to an array of community and civic organizations to support research into causes of, treatment for, and prevention of occupational and environmental diseases, increase and improve public awareness about work-place health and safety, and provide relief to the poor.

Related posts:

Kazan Law is the only Asbestos Law Firm in the World to present at iMig 2012

Families of Mesothelioma Patients Face Tough Choices When Weighing Surgical Options

doctor with patientWhen you’re taking care of a loved one with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), each decision is difficult. How can I keep them comfortable? Where can we get medical consultations or legal advice? Should we think about the full round of treatments or stay more conservative? At Kazan, McClain, Lyons, Greenwood and Harley, we’ve spent more than three decades helping people make tough but informed choices.

One of the more difficult decisions out there is whether to pursue surgery for mesothelioma. Some doctors are adamant that radical operations (like the extrapleural pneumonectomy, or EPP) will not cure the disease, while others emphasize that such procedures do provide pain relief and may extend survival time.

For those weighing the idea of surgery for MPM, here is a quick summary of some of the arguments for and against. This is by no means a complete list. To make a fully informed decision, talk with your oncologist and/or surgical specialist before making any decisions.

How surgery can help

Most public health agencies agree that, even for a disease as virulent as mesothelioma, surgery has several notable benefits. The first is that it can lengthen a loved one’s life by months, if not years. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) estimates that patients who receive surgery for MPM live an average of 16 months beyond their diagnosis.

Of course, survival time depends on several things. First, the earlier a patient’s disease is caught, the longer they may be expected to live. In a study published in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, researchers determined that patients with Stage I or II mesothelioma had much better odds of surviving two, three or even four years, compared to those with Stages III or IV.

The same report noted that pleurectomy/decortication and EPP are the two operations associated with the highest likelihood of prolonged survival.

Another benefit of surgery is that it often provides comfort for mesothelioma patients. In fact, the NCI currently categorizes all MPM procedures as palliative, meaning they do not cure the disease but they may ease chest pressure and make breathing easier.

There are a number of operations for MPM, some more extensive than others. A thoracentesis, in which fluid is drained from the pleura, is one of the simplest and most common procedures. More radical is the pleurectomy/decortication, which involves the removal of one lung and as much tumor mass as possible. Finally, the EPP is the most radical, removing as it does a lung, the lung and heart linings, and most of the diaphragm. Each surgery may provide pain relief or extend survival.

How surgery can be counterproductive

Sadly, not all operations for MPM increase a patient’s lifespan – or, if they do, it may be by a matter of weeks or months only. In the British Journal of Surgery, a pair of surgeons summarized the difficulties by pointing to Lionel Shriver’s memoir of dealing with MPM, titled So Much for That:

She plots the course, from diagnosis to death, of a woman with abdominal mesothelioma in present-day America. Fourteen months after being given a one-year expectation of life, her doctors run out of options and the family runs out of money. The oncologist comforts her bankrupt husband saying “we’ve probably extended her life a good three months.” The bitter irony of “good” strikes the spouse, but seems lost on the doctor.

Such situations are not the standard, but they do happen. It is best to know that while surgery can (and often does) help, it also may not.

Consider whether doctors believe an operation will make your loved one more comfortable. Talk to them, take some time to think about it and, in the end, do what you think is best.

My New Role as Chair of Public Justice’s Investment Committee

Steven KazanOn August 1, 2012, I became the Chair of Public Justice’s Investment Committee, tasked with overseeing the management of the Public Justice endowment, reserve and investment accounts. I will also continue as a member of Public Justice’s Board of Directors.

The Investment Committee aims to preserve capital and earn an adequate return in order to help Public Justice fulfill its mission.

This mission is to use creative litigation, public education and innovative work with the community to protect people and the environment, challenge wrongdoings and injustice, increase access to justice and inspire others to serve the public interest.

I enjoyed working on the Investment Committee this past year and helping it to redo the Public Justice investment policy for submission to the Board of Directors, which approved the new policy at its meeting last month. This will let me leverage my experience as an advisor to asbestos bankruptcy trusts (which currently manage over 20 billion in assets for the benefit of their asbestos victim beneficiaries) and apply it to a different context.

The issue of asbestos bankruptcy trusts came into focus during the summer of 1982, when manufacturers of the carcinogenic material began to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy in order to avoid having to pay compensation to workers and other victims who had been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases such as lung cancer, asbestosis and malignant mesothelioma.

I have been involved in asbestos litigation since 1974, and during this period had to react to this significant change. This trend of companies seeking bankruptcy protection continued in the 1990s and increased heavily in the 2000s. I have been involved on creditors committees representing asbestos victims in nearly all of those bankruptcies. Kazan, McClain, Lyons, Greenwood and Harley was at the forefront in pushing the courts to protect the rights of mesothelioma victims in the Combustion Engineering bankruptcy, and led the reorganization efforts that produced the Combustion Engineering Trust Fund.

This experience will be a tremendous asset as I take over as Chair of the Investment Committee for the Public Justice Board, and I hope to use the knowledge I’ve gained working with asbestos bankruptcy trusts to continue to protect the best interests of the public and the environment.

Get a Free Case Evaluation

Search Our Site

Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood

55 Harrison St. Suite 400
Oakland, CA 94607
888-990-7008

Mesothelioma Lawyers

© 2025 Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood.
A Professional Law Corporation.